As someone neurodivergent and who tends to write in a bit of matter of fact, explanatory way, I worry this'll affect me too. I also hate that words like 'delve' that have been around forever are now signs that our speech and non-AI writing has been infected with AI tells from just reading texts that have been AI influenced. Weirdly, I miss when bad writing was purely a human thing!
As I understood it, that “near zero false positive rate” comes from quite a limited sampling? That accusation with Pangram seems to be popular with a particular type of auditor/analyst account that likes to make definitive pronouncements from partial data makes me immediately sceptical
As someone neurodivergent and who tends to write in a bit of matter of fact, explanatory way, I worry this'll affect me too. I also hate that words like 'delve' that have been around forever are now signs that our speech and non-AI writing has been infected with AI tells from just reading texts that have been AI influenced. Weirdly, I miss when bad writing was purely a human thing!
As I understood it, that “near zero false positive rate” comes from quite a limited sampling? That accusation with Pangram seems to be popular with a particular type of auditor/analyst account that likes to make definitive pronouncements from partial data makes me immediately sceptical
Bravo!